eer Review Process-Challenges to Research Integrity | Crimson Publishers




Peer review is unanimous considered to be an essential part of scientific publication since its role is to evaluate, criticize and improve the quality of scientific research results preceding publication. A reviewer should strive to set the standards of the journal and of the field and to meet the standards of ethic.
The manner peer review is put into practice differs across journals or disciplines. The forms in which peer review can be accomplished are: Anonymous, Double blind and Open. For an effective peer review, some conditions are mandatory/ imposed. It has to be timely, thorough, constructive, free from personal bias, and respectful of the need for confidentiality [1].
The basic principle which reviewer should take into consideration along the review process are comprised in COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers [2,3]. Besides benefits, multiple downsides of the peer review have been evidenced. The non-standardized and idiosyncratic manner in which it is performed, along with its susceptibility bias led to to inaccuracy, inequity and a deficiency to confirm or attest research [4].


For more open access journals in Crimson Publishers Please click on link: https://crimsonpublishers.com
For more articles on Textile Science Engineering Journal Please click

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trends in Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology - Crimson Publishers

The Effect of Twist Multiplier, Elastane Percentage and Pick Density on Denim Quality | Crimson Publishers

Textile Industry a Tool of Economics Development in District Muzaffargarh (Pakistan)- Crimson Publishers