eer Review Process-Challenges to Research Integrity | Crimson Publishers
Peer Review Process-Challenges to Research Integrity by Magdalena Simona Fogorasi in Trends in Textile Science Engineering Journal
Peer
review is unanimous considered to be an essential part of scientific
publication since its role is to evaluate, criticize and improve the quality of
scientific research results preceding publication. A reviewer should strive to
set the standards of the journal and of the field and to meet the standards of
ethic.
The manner peer review is put into practice differs across
journals or disciplines. The forms in which peer review can be accomplished
are: Anonymous, Double blind and Open. For an effective peer review, some
conditions are mandatory/ imposed. It has to be timely, thorough, constructive,
free from personal bias, and respectful of the need for confidentiality [1].
The basic principle which reviewer should take into consideration
along the review process are comprised in COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer
Reviewers [2,3]. Besides benefits, multiple downsides of the peer review have
been evidenced. The non-standardized and idiosyncratic manner in which it is
performed, along with its susceptibility bias led to to inaccuracy, inequity
and a deficiency to confirm or attest research [4].
For more
open access journals in Crimson
Publishers Please click on link: https://crimsonpublishers.com
For more
articles on Textile Science
Engineering Journal Please click
on link: https://crimsonpublishers.com/tteft/

Comments
Post a Comment